MAGAZINE

May 2008, Fleet Financials - Feature

Executive Vehicles: Options in Dealing with End-of-Term Issues

By Staff

ARTICLE TOOLS        | E-MailPrint RSS

Surplus vehicles have always been a thorn in the side of the fleet manager. Drivers leave the company for one reason or another, and fleet managers must decide what to do with their vehicles.

Fortunately, regular fleet policy can provide a process by which vehicle use or disposal is handled. But what about executive vehicles? Executives are almost always provided a vehicle as part of an overall compensation package, and therefore, a company-assigned vehicle involves issues far more personal than that of a sales or service representative. It is a challenge, but there are options fleet managers can explore.

Most companies have written fleet policy documents in which the assignment and use of vehicles is covered in detail. Sales, service, or delivery vehicles are usually provided via a vehicle selector, from which a driver chooses among two or more make/model combinations. The key point is that the overall mission of the driver and the vehicle is generally the same no matter what choice is made.

For example, the company may have sales representatives whose job is to visit customers, sign up new business, deliver marketing materials, and occasionally entertain clients. The selector might offer three models, all four-door sedans, the differences between them merely style and trim.

Fleet policy permits the driver to choose from the approved selector, and a vehicle is assigned to each individual. Because the missions of both the driver and vehicle are the same, a number of options are available to the fleet manager to handle vehicles that become surplus when the driver leaves the company.

Executives are also covered in the policy. However the circumstances are entirely different. The only "mission" executive vehicles normally fulfill is providing an incentive in recruiting, hiring, and retaining scarce executive talent. Executive vehicles are most often strictly compensatory in nature. For that reason, options for fleet managers in handling surplus fleet vehicles are usually not available for their executive counterparts.

 

RATE THIS STORY

Average Rating: Not yet rated

COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Please log in to write comment.

New user? Sign up for new membership now!

ARTICLE ARCHIVE SEARCH

Sponsored Links

Flexible & Powerful Fleet Software
Chevin fleet management software - Where flexibility comes standard. Solutions for all types of vehicle and transport operations. Click Here.

BLOG

Predictions for Fleet in 2009

By Mike Antich
When looking ahead to the next 12 months, I foresee reduced operating costs for fleets offset by increased depreciation expense caused by anemic resale values and decreased incentive monies. Here’s why I believe this will be the case, along with other predictions for 2009.

2008: One of the Worst Years in Fleet History

By Mike Antich
I can’t recall a year as tumultuous as 2008. The year started with the Jan. 1 termination of the $1.8 billion merger between GE and PHH and ended with the near bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler. In between, we witnessed record fuel prices, then a spectacular freefall in fuel prices, a dismal used-vehicle market, unprecedented credit gridlock, the inability of some fleets to order new-vehicles, and fleet delivery disruptions due to a UAW strike and an epic Midwest flood that submerged rail lines.

Fleets Scramble to Cope With Extended Plant Shutdowns

By Mike Antich

Forecast for 2009: A Litany of Uncertainty

By Mike Antich

STORE

$10.00

ARN Magazine - July/August 2008

In This Issue:
TSD Turns 25, Defining Rent to Own, 2008 Travel Tax Study and much more…