Managing the Financial Side of Commercial Fleets

Minimizing Employee Litigation Through Arbitration Agreements

Not all arbitration agreements are created equal. Fleet managers must understand the limits of these agreements to properly implement them.

May 2013, by Richard Alaniz

Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution, where two sides look outside the court system to resolve a conflict.
Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution, where two sides look outside the court system to resolve a conflict.

Lawsuits are expensive and inconvenient, but employee litigation can be even more painful for companies, executives, and managers. Employee lawsuits hamper morale and could encourage other employees to follow with their own lawsuits. This kind of litigation can also expose information that companies would rather keep quiet. Additionally, such litigation can generate nasty PR, which can cause further damage to the company.

Fortunately, fleet managers can minimize many employee lawsuits and their fallout through arbitration agreements, where a neutral arbitrator hears the facts of the dispute from both parties and makes a binding ruling.

But, not all arbitration agreements are created equal. In fact, courts frequently throw out agreements that judges decide are flawed or too heavily biased in favor of employers. Employers need to understand the limits of arbitration agreements in order to implement effective ones that will provide all the benefits they are looking for.

The ABCs of Arbitration Agreements

Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution, where two sides look outside the court system to resolve a conflict. In arbitration, an impartial arbitrator listens to claims, facts, and testimony from both sides, then issues a decision.

By signing arbitration agreements, drivers typically waive their right to file lawsuits when they have a dispute with their employers; however, the obligation to arbitrate can vary. Some employers require all disputes to go to arbitration, while others designate arbitration for only certain issues.

Once employees (or former employees) decide to enter into arbitration, there are three basic steps in the proceedings — pre-hearing briefs, the hearing, and the arbitrator’s decision.

The pre-hearing of briefs allows the company and employees to present their views and describe their evidence to the arbitrator. During the hearing, each side presents their case to the arbitrator, which can include calling witnesses. Then the arbitrator makes a decision.

Pros & Cons of Arbitration Agreements

Because arbitration agreements offer many advantages for employers — and some that extend to employees, too — fleet managers should consider requiring them whenever possible. The following are some of the benefits:

  • Cheaper and faster. Litigation can drag on for years and cost vast sums of money. Arbitration is generally much less expensive. In some cases, neither side even needs to hire an attorney. Arbitration also usually proceeds much faster than lawsuits.
  • Greater confidentiality. Court records are usually public, and controversial or high-profile court cases can garner a lot of publicity — much of it negative — for employers.

Unlike jury trials, arbitration hearings are not public and typically provide a much greater level of privacy for both sides. This could be important if, for example, the dispute involves an injury to a third-party, as public finger pointing between the company and driver might be damaging from a public relations perspective.

  • Informality. Appearing in court can be intimidating for employers and employees alike, and the rules can seem archaic and illogical to non-lawyers. Arbitration hearings tend to be less formal than courtroom appearances. Hearings may take place in a conference room, rather than a courthouse, and arbitrators are often more flexible about working around participants’ schedules.
  • More predictable process. Juries are notoriously unpredictable and prone to emotional decisions. In arbitration, that unpredictability is minimized, replaced by a trained professional who should easily grasp the issues involved. Some employees may hope to hit the jackpot with a sympathetic jury and may consider the lack of a trial to be a downside. But, the fact is, neither side can predict the outcome of a jury trial. A more predictable range of outcomes is typically better for all.

Along with the advantages, though, arbitration can have negative consequences that fleet managers should understand, and include:

  • Employees may resent the agreements. While arbitration may be made a mandatory condition of employment, some people balk at signing employment arbitration agreements, according to a survey by Lake Research Partners. The majority of people (59 percent) oppose “forced arbitration clauses in the fine print of employment and consumer contracts,” the study reported. By their very nature, these agreements do require employees to sign away the right to settle disputes in the court system, and more sophisticated employees may realize that juries are generally more likely to side with plaintiffs than employers.
  • Confusion over arbitration. The survey also found that many people were unclear on the provisions of arbitration agreements. Nearly three-quarters of respondents thought they kept the right to sue their employer if they were seriously injured or had a major work dispute, even if they signed a binding arbitration agreement. Less than a third remembered reading about arbitration in their employment contracts.

To increase enforcement, be sure to make employees well aware of the agreement.

  • Less discovery. Arbitration also typically allows less discovery, or information that each side can get from the other. While discovery is lengthy and often adds a huge amount to the cost of the typical lawsuit, the lack of this kind of information can hurt both sides in an arbitration proceeding, especially if a driver is injured or has some evidence of culpability in an accident.
  • Inability to appeal. For all its flaws, the judicial system operates within a clear set of rules and precedents, and litigants can appeal when they feel a court ruling is unfair. Arbitrators do not operate within this type of framework, and most arbitration rulings cannot be appealed. So, if either side is unhappy with the arbitrator’s ruling, there is little recourse.

Twitter Facebook Google+


Please note that comments may be moderated. 
Leave this field empty:

Fleet Incentives

Determine the actual cost of owning and running a vehicle in your fleet. Compare vehicles by class and model.


Fuel Management

Bernie Kanavagh from WEX will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Fleet Tracking And Telematics

Todd Ewing from Verizon Connect will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Fleet Management And Leasing

Jack Firriolo from Merchants will answer your questions and challenges

View All


Sponsored by

Adding non-original equipment to a vehicle to change its operational capabilities.

Read more


Market Trends

Mike Antich
Upward Pressure on Fleet Costs Threatens to Increase TCO

By Mike Antich
Recently, I conducted a survey of several hundred fleet managers to identify emerging industry trends. One recurrent theme expressed by fleet managers was the concern that fleet costs are starting to experience upward pricing pressures. Here's what they told me.

How to Minimize Unauthorized Use of Corporate Assets

By Mike Antich

View All

Driving Notes

Paul Clinton
2018 Nissan NV Cargo

By Paul Clinton
The 2018 NV adds interior upgrades that make it more competitive with other full-size vans.

2018 Chevrolet Equinox Diesel

By Mike Antich

View All

Nobody Asked Me, But...

Sherb Brown
Adapting to a Changing Tide

By Sherb Brown
Fleets are often the beta testers of the vehicle market. That shift away from compact sedans we saw in the fleet market a few years ago is playing out in real time in the retail market right now.

Keep Realistic Fleet Expectations

By Sherb Brown

View All

In Memoriam: Coach's Insights

Ed Bobit
Thinking of the Newbies of the Future

By Ed Bobit
A lot has changed in the past 10-15 years, so we can only imagine this momentum will continue into the next decade-plus. How will this change impact the fleet manager of tomorrow?

Managing a Car vs. Work Truck Fleet

By Ed Bobit

View All


Up Next

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher